Monday, March 5, 2012

How Science Works 10/08/2011

Imagine this:  The foundation of all physics has become deeply and fundamentally flawed.  The center-post and anchor of all astro and subatomic physics disappears and all calculations made from this anchor has become suspect.  What not 98% of the scientists believe to be true, but what 100% of the scientists have been making assumptions and calculations upon no longer is valid.

It’s the equivalent of realizing the pi is not really 22/7 and it affects how we perceive such basic concepts as what is the past and the future,

After six months of scrutiny by by 160 scientists from 11 countries, the scientists at CERN are asking the world of physics why a neutrino has appeared to travel faster than the speed of light and to please find a way to disprove this observation.

Einstein told us that as a particle approaches the speed of light, it’s mass approaches infinity and time stops, thus precluding a speed above 186,000 miles per second.   Observations of the physical universe have seemed to prove this to be true.

Now maybe there may be exceptions, but we’ve dealt with this before.  That’s how science progresses.  Theories are formulated and believed to be true, then shown to be flawed and we build on the new theory, which then is proved to be flawed and so it goes. The purpose of the scientific method may just be to prove itself wrong.

As we get closer to the very small and the very big, we see that math and science as we have constructed them, don’t work.

In the wonder of the universe, no proven scientific standard can be held up as an undeniable truth.  Although this apparent observation about the neutrino getting to a location before it left home may eventually prove to be a measuring error, it’s there (or somewhere) to remind us that the results of science has been wrong in the past, they will be wrong in the future, and cannot be counted on to be the unwavering truth some have set it up to be.

No comments:

Post a Comment